Rudometkin Papers
Editorial
Editor’s Note: After months of stalling and under the threat of a lawsuit by the First Amendment Coalition, Modoc County officials have finally produced the personnel records of Rick Rudometkin. The files, while sparse, reveal he has no qualifications for holding the job as the county’s chief administrative officer.
It will come as no surprise to close observers of the on-going fiscal fiasco starring Modoc County, that an examination of the personnel files of CAO Rick Rudometkin (pictured, right) say next to nothing about the person holding down the top job in the county, but they say a lot about the board that hired him.
There is no documentation in Rudometkin’s files that remotely supports his ability to carry out the duties of a chief administrative officer -- particularly at a time when the county is embroiled in a treasury scandal of its own making.
When Mike Maxwell, an alum of the road department (now headed by Rudometkin) retired as CAO at the end of 2008, Rudometkin quickly applied to fill the vacancy, which would move him from director of transportation to the CAO desk. That was on Aug. 18, 2008.
In his application letter to Avery & Associates, the firm hired by the board to perform an executive search, Rudometkin rationalized that his current position had prepared him to move up to the CAO job.
At the time of his application Rudometkin had been director of transportation less than a year. Prior to that he was streets manager and public works inspector for the City of Dana Point.
Recognizing his brief tenure as transportation director, he wrote in his letter of application, “I have produced noteworthy innovative solutions and decisions in a multitude of areas within time and budget constraints with great success. I get things done.”
He did not specify what those “noteworthy innovative solutions” were in his letter to Avery. However, he did characterize himself as the “go to guy for some of the departments in the county when they need help or need something solved.”
Among the qualifications for the chief administrative officer position, as listed by Avery, are a bachelor’s degree in public or business administration and “at least five years of progressively responsible management experience in a public agency…a master’s degree is preferred.”
Although Rudometkin’s files indicate he has a BA in business management, he was not a finalist for the job and Avery did not recommend that the board consider hiring him.
Instead the board hired Mark Charlton, who holds three master’s degrees -- one each in civil engineering, economics and theology.
It was Charlton who resigned when it became apparent the board would not stand accountable for misappropriating treasury funds and would not endorse his plan for financial recovery.
It was Rudometkin who the board first placed as interim and later as the county’s full time CAO, replacing Charlton. (See April 5, 2010 blog posting).
That action, in which the board failed to search for a qualified CAO or even go back to Avery for a review of its contract, is the telling clue to the board’s dysfunctional handling of the public trust -- let alone the treasury.
What’s at risk here is the county’s solvency and the threat of bankruptcy. Together, the board and Rudometkin have exhibited questionable actions motivated by their indiscriminate ambitions.
In the meantime the board has been spending taxpayer dollars that are now reaching into the millions to compensate for services that could have been performed by Charlton or anyone with the proper credentials.
-- Ray A. March